You know that whatever the facts, the right will blame "liberals" and "Democrats" for losing Iraq; that's as inevitable as the fact that we've already lost Iraq -- and as inevitable as an arrogant president playing into Democratic hands by expanding the engagement (he already is). What would be inexcusable is if wobbly Democrats managed to maneuver themselves timidly into a corner that made them only the right-wing's scapegoats -- and not the champions that truly made their stand to end the war.
In 2008, the Republicans are going to have to run either amidst an electorate convinced that Republicans will be staying the course or amidst an electorate they've managed to bamboozle into believing "peace is at hand." If they manage the latter, they'll have a good chance of winning the election. But the only way they can do that is if Democrats can't claim credit for ending it first. I hope to be able to watch the Democrats truly try to end the war; it will be glorious. Because even if they start losing votes in Congress, the president and the party that enables him can only become politically weaker by the day.
A collection of Ideas, News, Opinions, Images and so on and so forth. Just anything that catches my eye in this 'Internets'
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Why Democrats can stop the war
A wonderful article by Rick Perlstein in Salon.com on Why Democrats can stop the war. No wonder, its called Politics :)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I am not sure how much research has gone into this paper by K.C.Suri for Overseas Development Institute in London, written in 2002. I am jus...
-
Here is the list of Top Richest Telugu folks. The spreadsheet has top 5 from 2009 and 2010 as well. 2010 Source: Forbes 2013 Source: For...
-
Haven't heard of this new kind of cricket bat until today. This cricket bat has a longer handle. Specifically "The Mongoose’s blade...
No comments:
Post a Comment